An independent review of your draft personal injury demand before it leaves the office. You get a written report naming every finding, where it appears, and what to correct. Final decisions remain with your firm.
No file, no obligation. Terms and secure transfer instructions come back before anything is sent. If the review doesn’t find something worth fixing, you don’t pay.
Review report
File 2026-0417 · Third-party BI · 214 pp. · 12 Aug 2026
Chronology is impossible as written. Critical
First treatment date reads 2026; date of loss is 2025. The imaging predates the appointment that ordered it.
Draft, p.2 · against provider records
PIP is not addressed anywhere in the letter. Critical
$28,138.75 in specials claimed, with no statement of what PIP paid, adjusted, or left outstanding.
Draft · Medical Specials and Damages
Non-economic figure is a clean multiple. High
Exactly three times the medical specials. Adjusters read clean multiples as arbitrary.
Draft · Settlement Demand
No hospital lien is addressed. Critical
Client was transported to the emergency department. The letter is silent on any lien, and no lien search appears in the file.
Draft · Liens and Outstanding Balances
Fourteen visits billed, three chart notes. High
Ochoa Chiropractic. The ledger shows fourteen dates of service; the file contains notes for three.
Records, Ex. 4 · Visit-level completeness
Every finding cites its source.Every report is read and signed by a person.
Not legal advice · Not case valuationSixteen checkpoints. Built from a decade of hands-on PI experience.
Every package is reviewed through an adjuster’s lens, testing the weakest points, not simply confirming the strongest. The risk is rarely the file that obviously needs work. It is the package that reads fine: clean writing, organized exhibits, and a date on page two that doesn’t match the records.
Tell us about the file. Terms, the handling policy, and secure transfer instructions come back before anything moves.
Through your own portal, in existing formats. Held only on an encrypted device, and destroyed on the schedule you set.
Every finding, where it appears, why it matters, and a ranked list of what to fix.
You correct what matters and the demand goes out tighter than it came in. Every call on strategy and content stays with the attorney of record.
Every figure recalculated, not read. Subtotals, the grand total, and every place a dollar figure is restated. Duplicate charges, missing exhibits, and liens the letter never mentions.
Treatment in an order that is possible. Imaging that predates the appointment ordering it, unexplained gaps, prior injuries unaddressed, and visits billed with no chart note.
Fault asserted rather than evidenced. Whether the mechanism matches the records, and whether comparative fault is met before it is raised against you.
A person, or a diagnosis. Whether the adjuster can picture your client, and whether every claim traces to the file.
Three figures for one number, in the same letter. The specials table adds to one total, the demand paragraph states another, and the narrative states a third. Each is internally consistent. None of them agree.
An adjuster who finds this stops trusting every other figure in the letter, and the credibility loss carries into the medical narrative. It costs nothing to correct before the letter is sent, and cannot be corrected afterward.
| Table of medical specials | $66,777.00 |
| Settlement demand paragraph | $68,477.00 |
| Damages narrative, p. 9 | $71,340.00 |
Verified by recalculation, not inspection
CaseDNA is quality control, not counsel. It reviews what is on the page and in the file, nothing more, and it says so in writing on every report.
Auto third-party BI, UM and UIM, premises, pedestrian, bicycle and motorcycle, dog bite, commercial and trucking. Not medical malpractice, not nursing home, not product defect, and nothing outside personal injury.
This is not a demand run through a tool. Findings are produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence, run against a protocol I wrote from ten years of plaintiff personal injury files. Every finding is then checked against the file by me, every figure is recalculated in code, and the report is signed before delivery. No report is ever sent straight from a machine.
Each state module is reviewed by an attorney licensed in that state. Where that review is not yet complete, every report says so on its face.
Transferred through your firm’s own secure portal, held only on an encrypted device, and destroyed on the schedule you set. Written retention policy provided before engagement.
No case valuation. We never tell you what a case is worth, or what to accept.
No legal authority. Case law, statutes and legal argument are for the attorney of record to add and verify.
No negotiation advice. The review ends where strategy begins.
No outcome promises. We do not predict or guarantee settlement results.
Stated on the page, and stated again on every report.
Say so on your file and the invoice is cancelled. No explanation required. Most firms send a single demand first to see what comes back. No contract, no minimum.
Rush turnaround (next business day): +$150. Higher volume priced on request.
In ten years of personal injury case management, I learned that exceptional work requires more than process. It requires care, precision, and attention to the details that tell a client’s story: chasing the missing MRI bill, catching the date that doesn’t reconcile, noticing the prior injury nobody addressed until the adjuster did. Most firms have no formal step between the case manager finishing the demand and the letter going out. That became the foundation for CaseDNA.
This is not your demand run through an AI tool. The sixteen checkpoints are not a template. I built them from a decade of hands-on PI case management, and every one exists because I watched an adjuster use it. AI runs them faster than I can and never tires, but it does not know which finding matters on your case. That judgment is mine. Every report is read line by line and signed before it leaves, because a file I have reviewed is a file I have treated as my own.
Every case has a story. Every story has evidence.
Then you ignore it. Every finding names its source so you can check it against the file in seconds, and nothing in the report obliges you to change a word. One round of follow-up questions is included if you want to talk any of it through.
Then I am not the right fit yet. The jurisdiction-neutral checks apply anywhere, but the state-specific ones do not, and a review without them would be incomplete. Tell me the state and I will let you know when it is covered.
Rush turnaround is next business day at $500. Say so when you write and I will confirm capacity before you send anything. Two business days is measured from receipt of the complete package, not from the request.
Transferred through your own portal, held only on an encrypted device, never on any third-party service, and destroyed on the schedule you set. You receive the written handling and retention policies before anything moves.
CaseDNA is new, and I would rather say so than imply otherwise. I am taking a limited number of files while the Florida module completes attorney review, which is also why the guarantee exists: if the review finds nothing worth fixing, there is no invoice.
No. It is quality control on a document. No case valuation, no legal authority, no negotiation advice, no outcome promises. Every legal question in the report is marked for the attorney of record.
Six fields. You’ll receive engagement terms, the handling and retention policy, and secure transfer instructions, then a written review back within two business days of receiving the complete package.
Do not attach client records to this form. No documents are submitted through this website. After terms are signed, the package is transferred through your firm’s own secure portal or case management system, the same way you send to record retrieval or a bill auditor. It is held only on an encrypted device, never on a third-party service, and destroyed on the schedule you set.
Nothing further is needed from you right now, and no documents have been transmitted.
Questions before then, or want to talk it through first?
contact@mycasedna.com
Quality control only. Not legal advice, not case valuation, and not a guarantee of outcome. Every call on strategy and content stays with the attorney of record.